I’m keen on the idea of keeping an eye on my home while I’m away (not that I’m ever really away these days). But I’m less keen on the idea of there being cameras in my home for that purpose, not just as a security concern but because I aspire to not live in a panopticon. That’s why the Minut security system caught my eye.
Kitted out with a fleet of sensors to monitor humidity, noise level, barometric pressure, mold risk, and motion, it physically lacks any way to capture imagery or intelligible sound recordings. How much can that fairly limited suite of information actually tell you? Way, way, way, WAY more than I expected, for better and for worse.
You get a bird’s eye view, not real-time info.
If part of the appeal of having security gadgetry in your home is being able to step in while you’re away and see what’s going on (or not going on) in real time, Minut is not going to fit the bill. Owning to its limited suite of sensors that track nothing more than a change in levels over time, the data it collects and serves up to the companion app on your phone in a series of line graphs doesn’t give you any indication of what is going on as it is happening. The readings come in periodically and at a delay.

The result is, unlike camera systems I’ve used before (Wyze, and Canary), Minut can’t give many any indication as to what the cat is up to at this very second, for instance. Instead, and arguably more valuable, it provides a 30,000-foot view of the last 24 hours or so, with telltale spikes if anything was abnormal. In rare cases, like if the Minut hears glass breaking or detects another alarm (as it once did after I burned some bacon), it will give you a push alert that something is amiss, but otherwise it is more of a logbook you check once in a while for aberrations than it is a window you can peer through.