8 photos
In search of the perfect family SUV (and because my editor wouldn’t let me test the MX-5 Miata RF), I took to California’s Highway 1 and put the Mazda CX-9 thoroughly through its paces. Does it hit the handling highs set by other Mazdas? Does it eschew the lumbering oafy-ness of most SUVs? Would its body roll induce seasickness previously only known to high-seas sailors? There was only one way to find out.
The Good: Like all Mazdas that we’ve tested, the handling and steering on the CX-9 are top notch. It’s predictable, does not exhibit body roll like similarly sized SUVs/crossovers and is genuinely spectacular to drive. Though it may look big and lumbering, the turbocharged four-cylinder does more than enough to get the CX-9 up and moving with its 250 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. The handling and engine combination, paired together with an interior that leaves little to be desired, makes for an SUV that fights well above its weight.
Who It’s For: The CX-9 makes for a great family car. It’ll keep the driver entertained while still offering plenty of space. It’s also great for outdoor-minded types who like to get outside and onto gravel and dirt roads in snow and sun. The SKYACTIV all-wheel drive works admirably and will get you where you need to go.
Watch Out For: I have few qualms with the CX-9, and those I do have are minor. First, I find the steering wheel to be a bit thin. (I know, it needs a steering wheel that finds a middle ground for all hand types and shapes.) Second, I wish that the CX-9 got slightly better gas mileage. 20 city / 26 highway isn’t terrible, but it certainly isn’t setting any records.
Alternatives: The best alternatives to the CX-9 would be Volkswagen’s Atlas V6 ($34,095+) and Subaru’s Ascent ($31,995+). Both are excellent options and are among the best in their class. You can read our review of the Atlas here, or the Ascent here.
